On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 06:33, Michael Schwartzkopff <[email protected]> wrote: > Simon Horman schrieb: >> >> (...) >> I agree that it would be good to have a good repository for >> hb2.99/pacemaker on on Debian Stable/Lenny (as opposed to the efforts >> to get hb2.99/pacemaker into Debian experimental and subsequently, >> Sid/unstable and Squeeze/testing). >> >> I may be mistaken, but as pacemaker wasn't included in Lenny I think >> it will be difficult to get hb2.99/pacemaker into backports.org, >> though if that was possible it seems like it would be ideal. >> >> If that isn't possible, I wonder if the open build service provided >> by SuSE would be a good option. I it already has Debian packages, >> though I'm not sure if it is able to cope with Lenny yet (as opposed >> to Etch which was Debian stable until quite recently). >> > > Hi, > > My intension just was to have a useable repository for lenny, the actual > debian distribution. If we could somehow bring it into the official > repositories, even better. > > In my opinion the SuSE build service as it is now is NO option: > - There are no usable packages for over half a year now. The packages > provided had dependencies not resolvable from the normal distribution.
Which ones? I find that very hard to believe given that it builds against vanilla installs of Etch. Perhaps there are other targets, such as Lenny, that it could support too - but thats a separate issue. > - There is no package for the i386 architecture, at least not if you add the > repository to your sources. Yes, not having "proper" Debian repositories is highly annoying. > - Much (!) slower build cycles compared to the SuSE products. What exactly do you mean here? The debian packages are built with the exact same tarballs at the exact same time as the packages from every other distro. > Sorry, but these reasons could be my personal impression. So when the > compile the first time ran through (after a lot of bugs) I decided to create > my own repository so I could use it my own. > > @simon: Perhaps you want to host the packages? Of, course I could do this > also. > > > Michael. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
