On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 19:00, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:53:37PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 13:27, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> Another option for such devices might be to use a Master/Slave and >> >> only have the master do monitoring. >> >> I wonder if the lrm hooks for stonith can handle this. >> > >> > Don't see any reason why they shouldn't. >> >> Does raexecstonith support the promote and demote actions? > > raexecstonith shouldn't care. But stonithd doesn't support such > actions.
Exactly - but you're going to get them sent to you if you run as a master/slave. Probably raexecstonith should just return 0 for them both - it doesn't have to do anything for them to work as m/s, it just cant return an error. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
