On 2009-04-22T16:41:42, Mark Hamzy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Typical usage of these variables is expected to be something like this:
>
> Health Attribute-value Meaning
> green 1000 server is happy, capable of running any resource
> yellow 0 server is marginal - it is desirable to
> schedule resources somewhere else if you can
> red -INFINITY server is unreliable (but still up) and should not
> be used
Basically your mechanism modifies the "base score" for a node, somewhat
similar to the cluster-wide default set by symmetric-cluster true (0) or
false (-INFINITY).
> So, what do you all think of this proposed functionality? Does it sound
> reasonable? Comments are appreciated.
Sure, but I'd go even beyond this and just add the mechanism for setting
the base score; translating health scores into these can be done outside
the core system.
And like Andrew says, this is a discussion for Pacemaker's list.
Regards,
Lars
--
SuSE Labs, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
