Andrew Beekhof schrieb:
> same way you got the stack trace.
> except instead of typing "bt", type:
>  print lpc
>  print *node
> 
(gdb) print lpc
$1 = 0
(gdb) print *node
$2 = {weight = 137125184, fixed = 0, count = 0, details = 0x0}

Should I open a bug ticket somewhere?

> Basically the version you're using wasn't able to do what you describe.
> Setting symmetrical made it work more often but there were still cases
> it couldn't handle.
> 
> Happily however, Pacemaker 1.0 does behave how you'd expect.

OK, then I have to give pacemaker 1.0 a try.

Thanks a lot!

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to