On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:06:02PM +0200, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2009 12:52:14 schrieb [email protected]:
> > Hello all.
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there now any use to having the 2nd interface connected with HA?
> 
> Redundancy in the heartbeat path.
> 
> > When previously configuring servers with HB 2.1.3, LVS and ldirectord I
> > had the resources listeing on eth1 and had heartbeat communicate over
> > eth0 on both servers to try and cut down on noise.
> 
> If you do not want to have the broadcast traffic on your net, use the ucast 
> statement in ha.cf
> 
> > Is there any reason to do this and if so in what way would you set it up
> > using single HA resources in a 2-node HA cluster?
> 
> Use: Redundancy of heartbeat path.
> 
> Setup:
> on node1:
> bcast eth0
> ucast eth1 <ip address of node2 on eth0>
> 
> on node2:
> bcast eth0
> ucast eth1 <ip address of node1 on eth0>

Adding 
> ucast eth1 <ip address of node1 on eth0>
> ucast eth1 <ip address of node2 on eth0>
in both ha.cf works as well. That way ha.cf remains equal on all
nodes.

> But anyway, using the resources net for heartbeat communication is not the 
> best idea.

Why not? Because of noise? There's not much traffic with
heartbeat. Of course, in this case it is preferable to use
unicast.

Thanks,

Dejan

> Better add a interface card to you server and user additionally 
> eth2.
> 
> By the way: When adding a new IF to the node you also could upgrade from 
> 2.1.3 
> to pacemaker.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
> MultiNET Services GmbH
> Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
> Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0
> Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21
> mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75
> 
> mail: [email protected]
> web: www.multinet.de
> 
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen HRB 114375
> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: G?nter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens
> 
> ---
> 
> PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B
> Skype: misch42
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to