On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote: > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >>> Cannot be requested in an explicit manner, though CRM should > >>> balance the number of resources on each node. I'm not sure if > >>> there is any guarantee it will do so. > >> OK, thanks for answer; so is the following configuration possible with > >> Linux-HA (total newbie alert): > >> > >> m active nodes to 1 passive node > > > > The answer remains the same. > > So let me get this straight: n-to-1 configuration is not supported by > Heartbeat? Even in version 2?
Version 1 supports only two nodes. As I said, you cannot tell the cluster that you have one passive node which should take over resources from a node which failed. The CRM simply doesn't work that way. You could configure constraints in such a manner (using location preferences), but that may not be practical if there are many resources. Thanks, Dejan > Regards, > mk > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
