I'm running HB 2.1.4. Does the following resource location
constraint work?
<rsc_location id="run_fsN" rsc="fsN">
<rule id="pref_run_fsN" score="100">
<expression attribute="#uname" operation="eq" value="fsN"
id="run_fsN_expression"/>
</rule>
<rule id="balance_run_fsN" score="80" score_attribute="loadd">
<expression attribute="#uname" operation="ne" value="fsN"
id="balance_run_fsN_expression"/>
</rule>
</rsc_location>
where 'loadd' is an node instance variable.
<transient_attributes id="0edd3c83-707f-4f61-85dc-2571e9a389e6">
<instance_attributes
id="status-0edd3c83-707f-4f61-85dc-2571e9a389e6">
<attributes>
<nvpair id="status-0edd3c83-707f-4f61-85dc-2571e9a389e6-
pingd" name="pingd" value="800"/>
<nvpair id="status-0edd3c83-707f-4f61-85dc-2571e9a389e6-
loadd" name="loadd" value="-20"/>
<nvpair id="status-0edd3c83-707f-4f61-85dc-2571e9a389e6-
probe_complete" name="probe_complete" value="true"/>
</attributes>
</instance_attributes>
</transient_attributes>
I want 'loadd' to modulate the score="80" part so machines with the
"higher" load will subtract more
from the score. I'm using attrd_updater to update the 'loadd' attribute.
thanks,
kevin
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
