Hi Junko-san,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 07:02:52PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> By the way, this is the tips for LVM RA...
>
> It is possible to prevent the warning from LVM command,
> like "File descriptor 3 (socket:[375969]) leaked on vgdisplay invocation.
> Parent PID 18253: /bin/sh"
> if we set "LVM_SUPPRESS_FD_WARNINGS" in LVM RA.
>
> --- /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/LVM.org 2009-07-03 18:04:06.000000000
> +0900
> +++ /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/LVM 2009-07-03 18:02:03.000000000
> +0900
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> # Initialization:
>
> . ${OCF_ROOT}/resource.d/heartbeat/.ocf-shellfuncs
> +export LVM_SUPPRESS_FD_WARNINGS=1
>
> #######################################################################
>
> We can get through the LVM's warning message with this way for
> a while if our customer don't want to apply the patch at once.
OK. Thanks for the tip. But I think that once it is thoroughly
tested we will just close all unnecessary files.
Thanks,
Dejan
>
> Thanks,
> Junko
>
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:50:16 +0900, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Junko-san,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 04:37:44PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> >> Hi again, :)
> >>
> >> Thank you for your quick reply.
> >> Our customer might hesitate to apply the new patch for their running
> >> system at once.
> >
> > Of course.
> >
> >> (I don't know their upgrade plan unfortunately)
> >> So I want to know whether Heartbeat can run safely without your patch for
> >> a while.
> >
> > Definitely.
> >
> >> I know that we should recommend the latest code, of course. :)
> >
> > Yes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
