Dear Dejan Thanks a lot.
Best wishes, Ivan * Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> [Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:03:26 +0200]: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:40:51PM +0400, Ivan Gromov wrote: > > Hello, Dejan > > > > Thanks for your last letter. Much appreciated! > > > The cluster tried to start it or intended to start it at this > > > node and failed. > > Do you mean that start method failed? > > I'm really not sure. Looking just now at the code, it seems like > the resource was already in the Started state at the time it > failed (due to the monitor timeout). I'm not sure if that is > documented, the best is to check the logs. > > > >> How does heartbeat use it? > > >Don't understand the question. The '_n' suffix means that the > > >certain operation will be repeated at the 'n' interval. > > Yes, it wasn't correct question. I'll try to reformulate it. > > I have timeout=90 and interval=30 for the res1 monitor. Assume that > the > > heartbeat start the monitor. Will the heartbeat start the monitor > method > > for res1 if previous monitor hadn't completed (timeout > interval)? > > No, the next monitor operation is initiated interval time after > the previous one finished. So, the monitor operations are not run > every 30 seconds, but 30 seconds plus the execution time. > > Thanks, > > Dejan _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
