Andrew Beekhof wrote: > The pre-reqs for a functional OCFS2 cluster (using the userspace stack) are: > * pacemaker 1.0 > * kernel >=2.6.26 > * ocfs2-tools >= 1.4.1 > * openais > > Heartbeat was only a possibility for SLES10 kernels which had this > capability patched in. > The patches were not accepted upstream and have since been deprecated. > The chances of getting them to apply on a recent kernel are minimal. So, bad news...
Another question. Is there a risk of data loss/corruption in my case if I use the (broken) Filesystem OCF script from 2.1.3? I'd say no, given the fact that the servers don't have shared storage, because it's a Primary/Slave DRBD configuration. DRBD makes sure that only one host can write at the same time. Actually it seems to me that we don't need OCFS because the idea is that all hosts have simultaneous write access to the shared medium -- like iSCSI or Fibre Channel. In our case only one host has write access at the same time to a non-shared medium. OCFS2 on the disk is the legacy of the previous DRBD setup with two primaries. So should we migrate to ext3? We postponed it as it would induce quite a long downtime. - cl _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
