On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Enno Gröper <[email protected]> wrote: > Although migration-threshold was set to the wrong value for what I > wanted, shouldn't pacemaker have set failcount to 1 and then try to move > the resource away because migration-threshold was reached?
Basically, yes. Or if the other node wasn't available, it should have just stopped the resource. > Anyway! I reinstalled pacemaker on one of the nodes in the meantime and > now everything works fine. Good to hear :-) _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
