On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Colin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2009 14:00:20 schrieb Colin: >>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >> >>> > Anyway: I would advise you not to use heartbeat any more, but to upgrade >>> > to pacemaker. >>> >>> We want to use pacemaker, however pacemaker in turn uses heartbeat (?) ... >>> >>> ... except that pacemaker can also use openais instead of heartbeat, >>> is that what you mean? >> >> pacemaker can use both. Teh difference is that openais is maintained. > > Ok, thanks for the notice -- the heartbeat page did seem a little > outdated, however we had planned on using it due to some prior > experience (several years back). > > (Now I only have to find out what OpenAIS -- and corosync? -- exactly > are and do, and what their relationship is, the documentation section > on their homepage is limited to a quickstart guide...)
I'd hold off on corosync for a bit, seems there were some regressions from the previous stable series that prevent it from playing nicely with Pacemaker. You might find the following useful though, its for Fedora 11 but the openais parts are pretty generic. http://www.clusterlabs.org/mediawiki/images/9/9d/Clusters_from_Scratch_-_Apache_on_Fedora11.pdf _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
