Lets see what he got. I for myself prefer ocf-agents over lsb scripts... for various reasons. But i agree it might be easier or sufficient sometimes to stay with lsb scripts.
> I think is better to use lsb:apache2 and not ocf:heartbeat:apache. At least > i don't have any problem with lsb:apache. > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Malte Geierhos<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> do you've enabled mod_status on your apache and allowed for localhost ? >> such as >> >> <Location /server-status> >> SetHandler server-status >> Order Deny,Allow >> Deny from all >> Allow from 127.0.01 >> </Location> >> >> in your apache.conf ? >> Because ocf:heartbeat:apache needs it... >> >> >> >> Am 16.10.09 11:07, schrieb dembi: >> >>> Anybody can help me to solve my problem. >>> I will be very thankful for any help. >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
