There's no need to pass that many -V options, you're seeing
developmental logging at that level.
Your config is fine.

"Warnings found during check: config may not be valid" <-- the keyword
here is "may"

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:43 AM, MAHESH, SIDDACHETTY M (SIDDACHETTY M)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I have tried to simplify the test case cib.xml as much as possible (see 
> attached test.xml) to reproduce the problem. Pacemaker version is v1.0.5, 64 
> bit version.
>
>  Crm_verify fails to validate the attached test.xml. I see lots of "Bad 
> Input" error messages in the output log. On the other hand, 'xmllint' 
> validates the test.xml file with no errors.
>
> # crm_verify -x test.xml; echo $?
> Warnings found during check: config may not be valid
>  Use -V for more details
> 1
>
> # xmllint -relaxng /usr/share/pacemaker/pacemaker.rng 
> /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/test.xml
> /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/test.xml validates
>
>
> I have narrowed down the problem section to the "rsc_order" section under 
> constraints. Having one "resource_set" under the "rsc_order" passes 
> crm_verify validation. Adding an additional "resource_set" fails crm_verify 
> validation.
>
> Note that I have included only one resource in each resource set for this 
> simple test case. My actual cib.xml has multiple resources in the two 
> resource_sets and some of the resources are clone resources.
>
> Comparing this with the "pacemaker configuration explained" document (page 
> 27) on pacemaker site, I do not see any obvious syntax problems.
>
> Has anyone encountered a similar problem?
> Is this a bug in crm_verify? If not, what is the problem with the test.xml 
> that is blocking crm_verify? If yes, is there a workaround for the issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Mahesh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to