Hi, Thanks reply.
How about the check with ping in ibmrsa-telnet? Of course, it is invalid in default. It is the same as SSH plugin. is it no good? though I understand that it is not enough... I would like to hear any opinion. Regards, Yoshihiko SATO > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Yoshihiko-san, >> >> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:15:56PM +0900, Yoshihiko SATO wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have two node cluster in active/passive mode with stonith. >>> STONITH plugin : ibmrsa-telnet >>> >>> When the power supply of active node (with RSA device) was >>> turned off, it don't STONITH. So it don't failover. (the >>> resource don't start) However, I hope to start failover if the >>> RSA device is stopping. For example, The SSH plugin avoids >>> this problem by the "livedangerously" parameter. >> I thought that that name would scare anybody who cares about >> their data :) >> >>> How can I implement it? >> We don't have such a thing. Somebody posted a while ago a link to >> SGI's failsafe sources where they implemented a rather elaborate >> scheme with which it was possible to use some heuristics to >> figure out if the node is without power. It may work and it may >> be a worthy addition to our fencing solution (providing that it's >> turned off by default). Though I personally wouldn't trust such >> witchcraft ;-) > > Agreed. I would never use it personally, but I've no objection to it > being added if a) someone else writes the patch and b) its disabled by > default :-) _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
