On 11/10/2009 at 04:56 AM, Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 09 November 2009 07:00:42 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > It would, but the stop action failed: > > > > Nov 9 11:07:12 Server1 lrmd: [4682]: info: RA output: > > (Postfix:stop:stderr) 2009/11/09_11:07:12 ERROR: Postfix returned an error > > while stopping. 1 > > > > This error comes from /usr/sbin/postfix. Not an expert on > > postfix, so CC the author of the RA, perhaps he can take a look. > > Actually, this > > > > Failed actions: > > > Postfix_monitor_50000 (node=Server1, call=16, rc=7, > > > status=complete): not running > > > Postfix_stop_0 (node=Server1, call=17, rc=1, status=complete): > > > unknown error > > looks like it's using a "restart" action, usually coded as "stop" followed > by "start". > > If the daemon isn't running to begin with, "stop" will fail.
That sounds like a bug in the RA. If the resource is already stopped, "stop" is meant to return success. Regards, Tim -- Tim Serong <[email protected]> Senior Clustering Engineer, Novell Inc. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
