2010/2/16 Michael Schwartzkopff <[email protected]>:
> Am Dienstag, 16. Februar 2010 20:50:33 schrieb Ciro Iriarte:
>> 2010/2/16 Michael Schwartzkopff <[email protected]>:
>> > Am Dienstag, 16. Februar 2010 19:25:47 schrieb Ciro Iriarte:
>> >> How is the recommended setup to have a high available LVS service?,
>> >> should we run ldirectord with pacemaker?, should we run ipvasadm
>> >> outside the cluster?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> CI.-
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would run the virtual IP (VIP) of the LVS server as a IPaddr2 resource
>> > of the cluster. If you have a NAT setup you alos would run the DIP as a
>> > cluster service.
>> >
>> > I also like to integrate ldirectord into the cluster since the cluster
>> > can check if the daemon still is alive.
>> >
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
>> > MultiNET Services GmbH
>> > Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
>> > Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0
>> > Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21
>> > mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75
>>
>> So, your recommendation would be to run ldirectord as a resource?,
>> what about the connection table synchronization in failover and
>> failback events?. I was initially planning to use LVS-NAT, but I'll
>> give LVS-DR a try...
>>
>> CI.-
>
> Connection table sync is the job of ipvsadm. Since this is a part of the
> kernel module the cluster (userspace!) would not help too much here.
>
> I'd start the sync daemons (master and slave) on both machines together with
> ipvsadm. The corresponding option in debian is "both". So both machines are
> master and slave. Since only one machine has the VIP this setup works.
>
> Greetings,
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
>
So having that working outside the cluster and ldirectord as a
resource would still give me Connection table sync, right?.

Thanks!
-- 
Ciro Iriarte
http://cyruspy.wordpress.com
--
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to