Hi Simon, I'm sure you are very busy so I even hate to bug you about this but do you know if/when you will be able to integrate these patches into the 2.6.33 or the 2.6.18-128 kernel, we are more then willing to test this patch vigorously.
Thanks again for all your help. Brian Carpio -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Simon Horman Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:19 PM To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP / LDIRECTORD On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:37:42AM -0700, Brian Carpio wrote: > Simon, > > Thank you very much, this would be very beneficial for us to get > working.. I did try the timeout value as you suggested and if I only send > one request every second (since that appears to be as low as I can make > it) then everything works fine, one DHCP packet is sent to one real > server, the next DHCP packet is sent to the next real server.. > unfortunately I am running tests at about 500 DHCP ACKs per second, so > the timeout never happens and all the packets still go to a single real > server. > > What can I do to help get "Julian Anastasov's" one packet scheduler > patches into the 2.6 kernel as this appears to be exactly what we need? If I ported the patch to 2.6.33 would you be able to test it? Testing would be a big help. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2777 - Release Date: 03/29/10 00:32:00 _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
