> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Lars Ellenberg > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 4:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] hblinkstatus - dead on one interface > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:07:10PM -0500, Patrick Cotner wrote: > > > > > > On 04/16/2010 07:04 PM, Patrick Cotner wrote: > > > > > cl_status hblinkstatus san02 eth2 reports 'dead' from san01. > > But later you show > > > > > > cl_status hblinkstatus san02 eth1 >> dead << this is the > > > > > problem > > So which one is it, eth1, eth2? > Just to make sure you are tcpdump'ing on the right one. > > > Here is the output of tcpdump on the suspect ethernet port: > > > > san01:~# tcpdump -i eth2 > > 21:02:42.459569 IP 10.1.10.2.46836 > 10.1.10.15.694: UDP, length 208 > > 21:02:42.850461 IP 10.1.10.1.52791 > 10.1.10.15.694: UDP, length 208 > > 21:02:43.463612 IP 10.1.10.2.46836 > 10.1.10.15.694: UDP, length 205 > > 21:02:43.463619 IP 10.1.10.2.46836 > 10.1.10.15.694: UDP, length 208 > > 21:02:43.854462 IP 10.1.10.1.52791 > 10.1.10.15.694: UDP, length 208 > > for a 10.1.10.0/28 this looks good. > > > 21:02:44.054676 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id > > 8001.00:0b:5f:09:55:00.800e, length 43 > > STP? > What exactly is this network, switched, virtual, direct link, ...? > > > -- > : Lars Ellenberg
I bow my head in shame. My config for eth1 on san02 was wrong in /etc/network/interfaces I'd used 10.10.10.0 as broadcast instead of 10.1.1.0 *sigh* Sorry for wasting your time. I should have caught that sooner. -Patrick Cotner _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
