Ooops , sorry for that second thread on same subject, in fact my copy-paste on subject has removed some blanks !
Yes I knew fence_ipmilan as I used it serveral years with CS, but it is an executable, whereas ipmi was a script, so fence_ipmilan is much less interesting when we want to modify some details. But ok it's a RH choice, I understand. I'll test it very soon on RHEL6. Thanks Alain > > Then two questions : > > > > 1. do you know/think it is a definitive choice ? > > Yes. (know) > > > or could it be changed > > in next future ? > > Nope. > > > > > 2. do someone here has already tested pacemaker with > stonith:fence_ipmilan ? > > Not me as I don't have such a device. > However fence_ipmilan will have had plenty of testing as part of RHCS. > > All my 1.1 testing is done with fence_virt which exercises all the > same code paths. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
