Hi,

On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 05:26:53PM +0200, Schaefer, Dirk Alexander wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> unfortunately it isn't. is there a similar functionality in the latest
> heartbeat vesion?

There is, but I can't say how it's packaged in your distribution.
It could be that it's in a package called resource-agents or
similar too. Best to ask to the distribution maintainer.

Thanks,

Dejan

> Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards
> 
> Dirk Alexander Schaefer
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Dejan
> Muhamedagic
> Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juli 2010 17:07
> An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Two curious problems with heartbeat and ldirector
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:25:29PM +0200, Schaefer, Dirk Alexander wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > well, that's a good to know information ;) it's latest version
> > offered by gentoo's package manager. I already played with
> > version 3.0.3. something I haven't understand so far is how to
> > configure the part ldirectord plays in my current setup with
> > heartbeat 3.0.3. I cannot find it anymore once installed
> > version 3.0.3. is there any substitute for it available?
> 
> It is probably a separate package (ldirectord). Depends on the
> distribution.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dejan
> 
> > 
> > Thanks and...
> > 
> > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards
> > 
> > Dirk Alexander Schaefer
> > 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Michael
> Schwartzkopff
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juli 2010 12:15
> > An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Two curious problems with heartbeat and ldirector
> > 
> > Am Freitag, den 09.07.2010, 11:40 +0200 schrieb Schaefer, Dirk
> > Alexander:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > I'm trying to setup a two nodes ha loadbalancer for two webservers and
> i've
> > > got two curious problems with heartbeat/ldirectord.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > The first is, that I cannot active the broadcast mechanism. If i
> uncomment
> > > 'bcast ethXY' in the ha.cf file then the following error is reported in
> the
> > > logs during the startup:
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >                 heartbeat[31484]: 2010/07/09_11:10:04 ERROR: glib: Error
> > > setting socket option SO_BINDTODEVICE: Protocol not available
> > > 
> > > heartbeat[31484]: 2010/07/09_11:10:04 ERROR: cannot open bcast eth0
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > and the service is getting stopped.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > the second problem is that although everything seems to work fine I
> cannot
> > > access the webServers through the vip. Ipvsadmin shows that the vip and
> the
> > > real servers are registered correctly. It also shows that requests to
> the
> > > vip are getting received. Even more, the failover to the second
> > > heartbeat/ldirectord machine works once I shutdown the current muster.
> But
> > > what ever I do the requests to the vip seems not to get routed/nated/.
> (I've
> > > tried gate and masq definitions in ldirectord conf) to the real servers.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > My setup:
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Os: gentoo 10.1 (amd64) (XEN DomU)
> > > 
> > > Heartbeat: 2.0.8
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > ha.cf:
> > > 
> > > debugfile /var/log/ha-debug
> > > 
> > > logfile       /var/log/ha-log
> > > 
> > > logfacility   local0
> > > 
> > > mcast eth0 225.0.0.1 694 1 0
> > > 
> > > auto_failback off
> > > 
> > > node   lb1 lb2
> > > 
> > > respawn root /usr/lib64/heartbeat/ipfail
> > > 
> > > apiauth ipfail gid=cluster uid=cluster
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > harecourses:
> > > 
> > > lb1 \
> > > 
> > >         ldirectord::/etc/ha.d/ldirectord.www.cf \
> > > 
> > >         LVSSyncDaemonSwap::master \
> > > 
> > >         IPaddr2::172.22.40.50/20/eth1/172.22.47.255
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ldirector.www.cf:
> > > 
> > > checktimeout=10
> > > 
> > > checkinterval=2
> > > 
> > > autoreload=yes
> > > 
> > > logfile="local0"
> > > 
> > > logfile="/var/log/ldirectord.log"
> > > 
> > > quiescent=yes
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > virtual=172.22.40.50:80
> > > 
> > >         real=172.22.40.110:80 masq
> > > 
> > >         real=172.22.40.111:80 masq
> > > 
> > >         service=http
> > > 
> > >         request="lbProbe.html"
> > > 
> > >         receive="OK"
> > > 
> > >         scheduler=rr
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > kernel config:
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS=m
> > > 
> > > # CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 is not set
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_DEBUG=y
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS=12
> > > 
> > > # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_TCP=y
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_UDP=y
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_AH_ESP=y
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_ESP=y
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_AH=y
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP=y
> > > 
> > > # IPVS scheduler
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_RR=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_WRR=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_LC=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_WLC=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_LBLC=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_LBLCR=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_DH=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_SH=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_SED=m
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_NQ=m
> > > 
> > > # IPVS application helper
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_IP_VS_FTP=m
> > > 
> > > # CONFIG_SCSI_MVSAS is not set
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > I have no idea what to check else. Can someone imagine what the problem
> > > could be?
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Thanks a lot and .
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Dirk Alexander Schaefer
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > 
> > 
> > First of all, do NOT use 2.0.8 any more. It is for about 5 years out of
> > date, buggy and, well, bad.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
> > Guardinistr. 63
> > 81375 München
> > 
> > mob: 0163 172 50 98
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to