Pushkar, thanks for writing. Comments below. On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Pushkar Pradhan <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry I haven't got a chance to go through the logs. I have a few questions > though: > > 1. Have you modified the resource scripts? What does cl_status rscstatus > return? What about cl_status hbstatus? They should at least see the other > node as alive.
I do not think that I modified any resource scripts. Here's the status things from both: r...@pfs-srv3:~# cl_status rscstatus local r...@pfs-srv3:~# cl_status hbstatus Heartbeat is running on this machine. r...@pfs-srv4:~# cl_status rscstatus local r...@pfs-srv4:~# cl_status hbstatus Heartbeat is running on this machine. > 2. Why don't you try with just the virtual IP as your resource? Does the > problem still persist then? Yes., I tried with ONLY the virtual IP. The problem still persists -- if I reboot both servers simultaneously, NONE takes over. If I then reboot one of them, the other takes over. > 3. Have you made some drastic changes to your ha.cf and haresources? > haresources is identical on both nodes right? Both files are identical. I maintain them on my desktop and copy to both servers via a makefile. > 4. I noticed in your haresources you don't have the other node listed > (pfs-srv4), if you don't want it to run any resource in normal situations you > should at least list the node. I added mention of the other node, with no resources, in haresources. It did not help. > 5. Is your line in haresources split across lines? In that case I think you > need a \ to split it across newlines. It is not split, it is one line. Thank you Igor > pushkar > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
