Hi Andrew, ok I'm convinced now. I'll change the configuration. Thanks Alain > A bunch of filesystem guys and cluster guys got together and thought > through all the corners cases[1] that were possible and decided that > having a resource manager in charge of a cluster FS that was using an > internal membership implementation simply wasn't supportable. > > If you want to understand that decision, then you'll need to start > googling the various mailing lists. > > [1] Not just when everything works smoothly _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
- [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Andrew Beekhof
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Andrew Beekhof
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Andrew Beekhof
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Andrew Beekhof
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Andrew Beekhof
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Andrew Beekhof
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
- Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker Alain.Moulle
