Hi, On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:54:57PM -0400, Buckingham, Brett wrote: > I will try out these patches this week and get back to you. > > I need some time to absorb the original intent of "monitoring" in the > RA. My initial thinking is to create a patch which differentiates > startup monitoring from runtime monitoring. The goal would be to allow > for apache to initialize over a reasonable timeframe with specific > startup monitoring logic. Regular monitoring at runtime should, I > think, quickly detect httpd death, so I don't think there's any value > looping / waiting for a period of time for the PID file / process to be > there. > > I'll post a proposed patch later this week. BTW, how does one get a > patch accepted into the next version of the RA?
Just send it to linux-ha-dev. And hope that somebody'll take care of it ;-) Seriously, we do try not to miss any user contributions. Thanks, Dejan > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
