On Thursday 28 October 2010 21:41:59 Greg Woods wrote: > I currently have an old heartbeat v1 cluster that I am moving to a newer > Pacemaker/heartbeat v3 cluster. That is, I am moving the functionality > of the old cluster to the new one so that the old one can be phased out. > The new cluster is running all the latest stuff from the clusterlabs > repo under CentOS 5.5 > > One thing the old one does is run Linux Virtual Server and ipvsadm to > farm out incoming SMTP connections to multiple mail processing nodes > (virus scanning, spamassassin scanning, alias lookup, etc.). I would > like to have the new cluster do this. > > >From what I have read, it appears that the "right" way to do this is to > > install ldirectord and set up an ldirectord resource in Pacemaker. The > problem is that I can't get ldirectord to install. There is an > ldirectord package in the clusterlabs repo, and a heartbeat-ldirectord > package in the CentOS-extras repo, and they conflict. Neither one is > installed now but I still get this error when I try to install > ldirectord: > > ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: > heartbeat-ldirectord conflicts with ldirectord-1.0.3-2.6.el5.x86_64 > Complete! > (1, [u'Please report this error in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Enterprise > %20Linux%205&component=yum']) > > The same thing happens if I disable the extras repo, and even if I do > "yum clean all" first. If instead I try to install heartbeat-ldirectord > and disable the clusterlabs repo (which might result in a package that > doesn't work right in any event), I get a different error: > > Transaction Check Error: > file /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/ldirectord from install of > heartbeat-ldirectord-2.1.3-3.el5.centos.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package resource-agents-1.0.3-2.6.el5.x86_64
Try to get rid of the file if it is still there. Try it again afterwards. > Is going to the source the only way to get ldirectord to install on this > system, or has someone else seen this before and know of a workaround? The resource-agents package is definitely the right one. And there should be no problem to install it after a fresh install. -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff Guardinistr. 63 81375 München Tel: (0163) 172 50 98 Fax: (089) 620 304 13
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
