On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>> "service httpd start" would give you running apache even quicker.
>
> (Yes, but I'd have to shut down the production website for kernel
> upgrades, disk upgrades, and occasional hardware failures.)
>
> More to the point, if "service httpd start" works, so should
> "crm configure primitive website lsb:httpd". And there is no such thing
> as "unknown error" -- there's messed up config file, socket already in
> use, apache binary is wrong elfclass or not executable at all, and
> that's about it.

You keep comparing oranges and apples. I don't know what's wrong with
Apache lsb, I'd never use it for production configuration neither
Heartbeat v1. It was already told several times: yes Heartbeat v1.
checks that service httpd  started, and no Heartbeat v1 does not
guarantee that it keeps running. You should not compare Heartbeat v1
to Pacemaker (Heartbeat v2 is the wrong name for it). You should
compare Pacemaker to RedHat Cluster Suite, Veritas VCS, Oracle
Clusterware (but not Oracle RAC) or HP Service Guard. And you'd be
pretty surprised how difficult those product to learn and understand.

>
> Dima
> --
> Dimitri Maziuk
> Programmer/sysadmin
> BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>



-- 
Serge Dubrouski.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to