I repeated my testing process a couple times before doing this. My test partition didn't have much on it though, just a few simple text files versus the millions of files on a maildir partition for 100+ users. Perhaps my test partition wasn't "full" enough?
On 11/13/10 10:01 AM, "Dimitri Maziuk" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 11/12/2010 7:43 PM, Syn, Joonho wrote: > >I think you have to >> -remove the journal of the ext3 partition "tune2fs O ^has_journal [my >>device]" >- fsck at this point >> -delete and recreate the partition using fdisk >- resize2fs at this point >> -check the newly expanded partition for errors "fsck n [my device] >> >> At this point the fsck returned a "bad superblock error". I tested >using a similar setup but without heartbeat and did not get any >corruption. Any ideas as to what led to my bad superblocks? > >I have not done this in a while, but my recollection is you're supposed >to get bad superblocks when you run fsck and partition size doesn't >match filesystem size. So the real question is why didn't you get them >in your testing. > >Dima >_______________________________________________ >Linux-HA mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
