On Thursday 18 November 2010 16:06:38 Matthew Richardson wrote:
> I've been playing with the existing HealthSMART RA in Pacemaker and have
> discovered a number of fundamental bugs and errors with it that mean it
> will never have worked for anyone.
> 
> I've done a big overhaul of this RA, replacing most of the logic to make
> it work properly, and extending the component to cover a few more
> use-cases:
> 
> - Handles lists of drives
> - Handles 'devices' behind drives - useful for RAID devices e.g 3ware,
> megaraid etc
> - Threshold for 'yellow' is now configurable (relative to upper/lower
> limits)
> - Various bugfixes, typos, indentation etc
> 
> I've attached the whole RA to thsi email, as its changed enough that a
> diff would have just been unhelpful.
> 
> I'm fairly sure that the logic behind the smartctl result handling is
> correct, I'm pretty sure the shell is all valid, but as I've been
> working with an existing 'template' I can't guarantee that the
> ocf-related bits are valid, as this is the area I know least about.
> 
> I've tested it as much as I can, but I'd be grateful if other people
> could review the code/test the RA and let me know if there are any
> obvious bugs, errors or 'just plain bad code' in it :)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matthew

good to hear!

-- 
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
Guardinistr. 63
81375 München

Tel: (0163) 172 50 98

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to