On Monday 13 December 2010 17:36:05 Serge Dubrouski wrote: > BTW, here is one more Open Source alternative to Pacemaker for those > who're building HA storage systems: http://www.openfiler.com/ > > But I really doubt that it's easy ti learn and set up. > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Pieter Baele <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 20:39, Igor Chudov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat > >>> Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple. > >>> > >>> What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ? > >> > >> DRBD/Pacemaker was complicated, documentation did not exist or did not > >> match the behavior, the GUI was broken and never really worked. Config > >> files were completely opaque. I spent weeks on this without having > >> something that could work and was documentable. > > > > Yeah... Try Veritas Cluster + Storage Foundation then. > > First, you have to go through more then 1000 pages of documentation .... > > > > In a few words: very complete (+), bloated, expensive > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
It uses DRBD and Heartbeat if I'm not mistaking, so "alternative" might not be the word ;-) it is easier to set up though. B. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
