On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Alain.Moulle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to execute the same test with el6 GA releases, meaning : > corosync-1.2.3-21.el6.x86_64 > pacemaker-1.1.2-7.el6.x86_64 > > Good news , it seems much more stable ,
Even better news, this version doesn't include the performance improvements I blogged about recently :-) Hopefully EPEL6 comes out soon and I can build some updated packages. > I 've configured this time 140 > resnames Dummy > with 70 on each node, and launched the same test of start/stop (with > longer sleep between of course) > and it has worked fine during 44 loops, but at the 44th loop, I had the > error : > > Call cib_replace failed (-41): Remote node did not respond > <null> > > on the node where the script test was running, so the test has been > stopped by this error, BUT > when I arrive in the morning, pacemaker was "up" on both nodes and I can > execute crm_mon > on both nodes and see both nodes "On line" and all resources were in the > expected state (with > regard to where the script test has been stopped). > > So , that's much more stable. > > Next step, I'll try to configure with stack option 3 (pcmk + cman + > corosync) and try the > same test. > > (if someone want to reproduce the error above with the same test, I can > send the little scripts > even if they are very simple) > > Alain > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
