On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 02:08:34PM +0200, Alexander Bodnarashik wrote:
> I've moved a little bit further with running linux ha suite on freebsd, few 
> more problems though:
> 
> 1. crm node standby/online is not working
> issuing following command has no effect and node remains online/standby
> > [r...@alice ~]# crm node standby alice.local reboot
> > scope=nodes  name=standby value=off
> > [r...@alice ~]# 
> debug log says:
> > Dec 10 13:51:09 alice cib: [50795]: debug: cib_process_xpath: Processing 
> > cib_query op for 
> > //cib/configuration/nodes//no...@id='alice.local']//nvpa...@name='standby'] 
> > (/cib/configuration/nodes/node[3]/instance_attributes/nvpair)
> > Dec 10 13:51:09 alice cib: [50795]: debug: cib_process_xpath: Processing 
> > cib_query op for 
> > //cib/configuration/nodes//no...@id='alice.local']//nvpa...@name='standby'] 
> > (/cib/configuration/nodes/node[3]/instance_attributes/nvpair)
> in case if attribute does not exist output is following:
> > [r...@alice ~]# crm node standby alice reboot
> > Error performing operation: The object/attribute does not exist
> > scope=status  name=standby value=off
> and logs:
> > Dec 10 14:07:36 alice cib: [50795]: debug: cib_process_xpath: cib_query: 
> > //cib/configuration/nodes//no...@id='alice.local']//nvpa...@name='standby'] 
> > does not exist
> > Dec 10 14:07:36 alice cib: [50795]: debug: cib_process_xpath: cib_query: 
> > //cib/status//node_sta...@id='alice.local']//nvpa...@name='standby'] does 
> > not exist
> 
> on the other hand following puts node in standby mode:
> > [r...@alice ~]# crm node attribute alice.local set standby on 
> > [r...@alice ~]# 

Best to open a bugzilla for this. It's funny because newer crm
shell version in 1.1 uses crm_attribute for standby/online. The
stable 1.0 series however still relies on crm_standby.

> 2. hb_report basically does not work as expected:
> > [r...@alice ~]# hb_report -f 1pm  /root/hb.log
> > alice.local: INFO: logd used but logd.cf not found: using defaults
> > alice.local: WARN: this is not a node and you didn't specify a list of 
> > nodes using -n
> > alice.local: WARN: could not find  on alice.local

hb_report obviously cannot figure out that this node is a member
of the cluster. Was pacemaker running at that point in time? Did
you try to specify the nodes with -n?

> > The report is saved in /root/hb.log.tar.bz2
> > [r...@alice ~]# tar tjf /root/hb.log.tar.bz2
> > hb.log/
> > hb.log/analysis.txt
> > hb.log/description.txt
> > [r...@alice ~]# 
> 
> 
> My configuration:
> > [r...@alice ~]# uname -a
> > FreeBSD alice.local 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:55:53 
> > UTC 2010     [email protected]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
> 
> > [r...@alice ~]# cibadmin -$
> > cibadmin 1.0.10 for OpenAIS (Build: 
> > b0266dd5ffa9c51377c68b1f29d6bc84367f51dd)
> > 
> > Written by Andrew Beekhof
> 
> > [r...@alice ~]# corosync -v
> > Corosync Cluster Engine, version '1.2.8' SVN revision '3035'
> > Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> > [r...@alice ~]# crm configure show
> > node alice.local \
> >     attributes standby="on"
> > node bob.local \
> >     attributes standby="off"
> > node mike.local
> > property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
> >     dc-version="1.0.10-b0266dd5ffa9c51377c68b1f29d6bc84367f51dd" \
> >     cluster-infrastructure="openais" \
> >     expected-quorum-votes="3" \
> >     no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
> >     stonith-enabled="true" \
> >     last-lrm-refresh="1291296991" \
> >     default-resource-stickiness="100" \
> >     stonith-action="reboot"
> > rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \
> >     allow-migrate="true"
> > op_defaults $id="op-options" \
> >     on-fail="restart"
> 
> > [r...@alice ~]# crm_mon -1
> > ============
> > Last updated: Fri Dec 10 14:02:28 2010
> > Stack: openais
> > Current DC: alice.local - partition WITHOUT quorum
> > Version: 1.0.10-b0266dd5ffa9c51377c68b1f29d6bc84367f51dd
> > 3 Nodes configured, 3 expected votes
> > 0 Resources configured.
> > ============
> > 
> > Node alice.local: standby
> > OFFLINE: [ mike.local bob.local ]
> 
> Please let me know if i should provide more info.

Are those nodes really offline? Did you manage to form a
cluster?

Thanks,

Dejan

> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to