Hi, On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Nico Faerber wrote: > Salute > > I have some troubles setting up a pingd clone resource. > I'm using pacemaker 1.0.8 with corosync 1.2.0 running on a ubuntu 10.04. > > after setting up the resource crm/configure/show gives this: > > primitive pingd ocf:pacemaker:pingd \
I think that the connectivity RA du jour is ocf:pacemaker:ping. So probably better to try with that one. > params host_list="192.168.250.55" multiplier="100" \ > op monitor interval="15s" timeout="20s" \ > op start interval="0s" timeout="90s" \ > op stop interval="0s" timeout="100s" > clone pingdclone pingd \ > meta globally-unique="false" > > with crm_mon i see the clone resource is running: > > Clone Set: pingdclone > Started: [ zs-lb2 zs-lb1 ] > > now i do: > > #cibadmin -Q | grep pingd | grep value > > <nvpair id="pingdclone-meta_attributes-globally-unique" > name="globally-unique" value="false"/> > <nvpair id="pingd-instance_attributes-host_list" > name="host_list" value="192.168.250.55"/> > <nvpair id="pingd-instance_attributes-multiplier" > name="multiplier" value="100"/> > <nvpair id="status-zs-lb2-pingd" name="pingd" value="100"/> > <nvpair id="status-zs-lb1-pingd" name="pingd" value="100"/> > > ok, that should be correct now. But it took a long time until both > nodes had a value of 100. The updates happen at the time monitor runs plus the dampen interval. > before that, one node had value="0", the other had value="100". > > when i now edit the cib via crm subshell and add a second ip address > to host_list, verify and commit i get this: > > #cibadmin -Q | grep pingd | grep value > > <nvpair id="pingdclone-meta_attributes-globally-unique" > name="globally-unique" value="false"/> > <nvpair id="pingd-instance_attributes-host_list" > name="host_list" value="192.168.250.55 192.168.300.40"/> > <nvpair id="pingd-instance_attributes-multiplier" > name="multiplier" value="100"/> > <nvpair id="status-zs-lb2-pingd" name="pingd" value="100"/> > <nvpair id="status-zs-lb1-pingd" name="pingd" value="200"/> > > but both nodes should have value="200" because i am able to ping both > ip addresses from both nodes manually. or am i wrong? No. Both should get updated. > why is the cib not up to date? Any hints? Don't know. Please try the other RA. Thanks, Dejan > thanks Nico > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
