Igor Chudov wrote: > At this point I feel rather desperate. Perhaps I should give "pacemaker" > another go. I really have no idea and I am running out of options.
If all you need is a 2-node active-passive cluster, most (all?) pacemaker features are useless for you. (Besides, one look at their apache resource agent tells me I'm better off with my mon scripts.) I haven't figured out how to get 3.0.3 to log anything in "R1" mode, but other than that it worked for a couple of weeks I had it up. But that was on centos 5 w/ pacemaker repo rpms. Who knows how ubuntu built their debs. Dima -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
