Did you make sure to use different values for "nodename:" on both nodes?
Its an easy cut&paste error to make.

Otherwise it looks pretty sane.  What do the logs say?

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Alain.Moulle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to make working the Option 3, but it does not start .
>
> I have two nodes, the network indicated in ringnumber  0 of
> corosync.conf  is working fine.
> Moreover, these two nodes were working fine with option 1 corosync, and
> pacemaker,
> so I just change the corosync.conf in adding the revords
> cluster/clusternodes&cman ,
> service/corosync_man and quorum/quorum_cman , then I execute on both nodes :
> service corosync start
>    => ok on both nodes
> service pacemaker start
>    => ok on both nodes
> and 60s later, crm_mon displays on node chili2 :
> ============
> Last updated: Thu Dec 16 13:39:37 2010
> Stack: cman
> Current DC: NONE
> 1 Nodes configured, unknown expected votes
> 0 Resources configured.
> ============
>
> Online: [ chili2 ]
>
> and on node chili3 :
>
> ============
> Last updated: Thu Dec 16 13:40:10 2010
> Current DC: NONE
> 0 Nodes configured, unknown expected votes
> 0 Resources configured.
> ============
>
>
> so it seems that chili2 does not "enter" in the cluster, but I can't
> find the reason ...
> Below are some infos about configuration.
> I think I miss an option somewhere but where ...?
>
> Thanks if you have any idea.
> Alain
>
> cib.xml on chili2:
> cat /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/cib.xml
> <cib epoch="4" num_updates="0" admin_epoch="0"
> validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" cib-last-written="Thu Dec 16 12:03:44
> 2010" crm_feature_set="3.0.2">
>  <configuration>
>    <crm_config>
>      <cluster_property_set id="cib-bootstrap-options">
>        <nvpair id="cib-bootstrap-options-dc-version" name="dc-version"
> value="1.1.2-f059ec7ced7a86f18e5490b67ebf4a0b963bccfe"/>
>        <nvpair id="cib-bootstrap-options-cluster-infrastructure"
> name="cluster-infrastructure" value="cman"/>
>      </cluster_property_set>
>    </crm_config>
>    <nodes>
>      <node id="chili2" uname="chili2" type="normal"/>
>    </nodes>
>    <resources/>
>    <constraints/>
>  </configuration>
>  <status/>
>
> cib.xml on chili3 :
> <cib epoch="0" num_updates="0" admin_epoch="0"
> validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" cib-last-written="Thu Dec 16 12:02:22 2010">
>  <configuration>
>    <crm_config/>
>    <nodes/>
>    <resources/>
>    <constraints/>
>  </configuration>
>  <status/>
>
> _corosync.conf add-ons versus the corosync.conf used with option 1 :_
> cluster {
>        name : HA
>
>        clusternodes {
>                clusternode {
>                        votes: 1
>                        nodeid: 1
>                        name: chili2
>                }
>                clusternode {
>                        votes: 1
>                        nodeid: 2
>                        name: chili3
>                }
>        }
>        cman {
>                expected_votes: 2
>                cluster_id: 1
>                nodename: chili2
>                two-node: 1
>                max_queued: 10
>        }
> }
> service {
>        name: corosync_cman
>        ver:  0
> }
> quorum {
>        provider: quorum_cman
> }
>
> _and other records remain the same:_
> aisexec {
>        user:   root
>        group:  root
> }
> totem {
>
>        version: 2
>        token:          5000
>        token_retransmits_before_loss_const: 20
>        join:           1000
>        consensus:      7500
>        vsftype:        none
>        max_messages:   20
>        secauth:        off
>        threads:        0
>        clear_node_high_bit: yes
>        rrp_mode :       active
>        interface {
>                ringnumber: 0
>                bindnetaddr: 16.2.0.0
>                mcastaddr: 226.1.1.1
>                mcastport: 5405
>        }
>  }
>  logging {
>        fileline: off
>        to_syslog: yes
>        to_stderr: no
>        syslog_facility: daemon
>        debug: on
>        timestamp: on
>  }
>
>  amf {
>        mode: disabled
>  }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to