On Friday 04 February 2011 14:35:35 Ulrich Windl wrote: > Lars, > > you are right, and I saw that my guess to use /proc/stat was wrong. top is > slow in getting the current CPU usage. So basically I wondered if you need > the CPU usage at all. If you'd switch to "load", you could get it a lot > faster. > > To be honest: I wondered what "HealthCPU" would monitor about the CPU's > "health" when initially looking into it. I was kind of disappointed to see > that it simply inspects the CPU usage (A CPU that is 100% busy (0% idle) > may be quite healthy) ;-) > > Regards, > Ulrich
Please consider the CPUHealth RA as a first try. Useful patches are always welcome. Greetings, -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff Guardinistr. 63 81375 München Tel: (0163) 172 50 98
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
