Happily this appears to be fixed in 1.1.5 (which I believe should be
available for SLES "soon").

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Haussecker, Armin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have sles11 sp1 with pacemaker 1.1.2-0.7.1 and corosync 1.2.6-0.2.2.
>
> Attached please find
> cibadmin -Ql before stopping StorGr1 on node goat1 (diag.before)
> cibadmin -Ql after stopping StorGr1 on node goat1  (diag.after)
> crm_mon      after stopping StorGr1 on node goat1  (diag.crm_mon)
> ptest -sL    after stopping StorGr1 on node goat1  (diag.ptest)
>
> Regards,
> Armin Haussecker
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 8:46 AM
> To: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] resource not restarted due to score value
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Haussecker, Armin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in our 2-node-cluster we have a clone resource StorGr1 and two primitive 
>> resources
>> DummyVM1 and DummyVM2.
>> StorGr1 should be started before DummyVM1 and DummyVM2 due to order 
>> constraints.
>> StorGr1 clone was started on both cluster nodes goat1 and sheep1.
>> DummyVM1 and DummyVM2 were both started on node goat1.
>>
>> Then we stopped StorGr1 on node goat1. We expected a restart of DummyVM1 and
>> DummyVM2 on the second node sheep1 due to the order constraints.
>> But only DummyVM2 was restarted on the second node sheep1.
>> DummyVM1 was stopped and remained in the stopped state:
>>
>> Clone Set: StorGr1-clone [StorGr1]
>>     Started: [ sheep1 ]
>>     Stopped: [ StorGr1:1 ]
>> DummyVM1        (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Stopped
>> DummyVM2        (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sheep1
>>
>> Difference: DummyVM1 has a higher allocation score value for goat1 and
>> DummyVM2 has a higher allocation score value for sheep1.
>>
>> How can we achieve a restart of the primitive resources independently of the
>> allocation score value ?
>> Do we need other or additional constraints ?
>
> Shouldn't need to.
> Please attach the result of cibadmin -Ql when the cluster is in this state.
>
> Also some indication of what version you're running would be helpful.
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Armin Haussecker
>>
>> Extract from CIB:
>> primitive DummyVM1 ocf:pacemaker:Dummy \
>>        op monitor interval="60s" timeout="60s" \
>>        op start on-fail="restart" interval="0" \
>>        op stop on-fail="ignore" interval="0" \
>>        meta is-managed="true" resource-stickiness="1000" 
>> migration-threshold="2"
>> primitive DummyVM2 ocf:pacemaker:Dummy \
>>        op monitor interval="60s" timeout="60s" \
>>        op start on-fail="restart" interval="0" \
>>        op stop on-fail="ignore" interval="0" \
>>        meta is-managed="true" resource-stickiness="1000" 
>> migration-threshold="2"
>> primitive StorGr1 ocf:heartbeat:Dummy \
>>        op monitor on-fail="restart" interval="60s" \
>>        op start on-fail="restart" interval="0" \
>>        op stop on-fail="ignore" interval="0" \
>>        meta is-managed="true" resource-stickiness="1000" 
>> migration-threshold="2"
>> clone StorGr1-clone StorGr1 \
>>        meta target-role="Started" interleave="true" ordered="true"
>>
>> location score-DummyVM1 DummyVM1 400: goat1
>> location score-DummyVM2 DummyVM2 400: sheep1
>>
>> order start-DummyVM1-after-StorGr1-clone inf: StorGr1-clone DummyVM1
>> order start-DummyVM2-after-StorGr1-clone inf: StorGr1-clone DummyVM2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to