Am 29.03.2011 02:35, schrieb Vadym Chepkov: > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Christoph Bartoschek wrote: > >> Am 28.03.2011 16:30, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:33:49PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am testing a NFS failover setup. During the tests I created a >>>> split-brain situation and now node A thinks it is primary and uptodate >>>> while node B thinks that it is Outdated. >>>> >>>> crm_mon however does not indicate any error to me. Why is this the case? >>>> I expect to see anything that shows me the degraded status. How can this >>>> be fixed? >>> >>> The cluster relies on the RA (in this case drbd) to report any >>> problems. Do you have a monitor operation defined for that >>> resource? >> >> I have the resource defined as: >> >> primitive p_drbd ocf:linbit:drbd \ >> params drbd_resource="home-data" >> op monitor interval="15" role="Master" \ >> op monitor interval="30" role="Slave" >> >> Is this a correct monitor operation? > > > Just out of curiosity, you do have ms resource defined? > > ms ms_p_drbd p_drbd \ > meta master-max="1" master-node-max="1" clone-max="2" > clone-node-max="1" notify="true" > > Because if you do and cluster is not aware of the split-brain, drbd RA has a > serious flaw. >
I'm sorry. Yes, the ms resource is also defined. Christoph _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
