>>> Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> schrieb am 02.05.2011 um 13:20 in >>> Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Ulrich Windl > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> schrieb am 29.04.2011 um 09:31 in > Nachricht > > <[email protected]>: > >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Dominik Klein <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > It waits $dampen before changes are pushed to the cib. So that > >> > eventually occuring icmp hickups do not produce an unintended failover. > >> > > >> > At least that's my understanding. > >> > >> correcto > > > > Hi! > > > > Strange: So the update is basically just delayed by that amount of time? I > see no advantage: If you put a bad value to the CIB immediately or after some > delay, the value won't get better by that. "Damping" siggests some filtering > to me, but you are saying your are not filtering the values, but just > delaying them. Right? > > Only the "current" value is written. > So the cluster will tolerate "minor" outages provided they last for > less than the dampen interval and the monitor frequency is high > enough.
Hi! It seems I'll have to use the source to understand. Maybe then I can suggest how to properly describe it ;-) Thanks anyway, maybe I'm too stupid to understand. Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
