On 9/18/2011 7:22 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk<[email protected]>  wrote:
...
> No it means one of more filesystem_drbd and primitive_nfslock
> operations failed really badly on node1.
> Possibly it was the initial health check (to check it wasn't already
> running before the cluster started) and subsequent failed "stop".

I'm sorry Andrew, but even if your explanation actually contained any 
useful information ("something went wrong" isn't), it's a month out of 
date. I had it running the day I found 3.0.4 in epel -- in haresources 
mode, so you're welcome to consider this a troll.

Dima
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to