hmm HA-1 pastebin is gone, here again: HA-1 off http://pastebin.com/F0kDHFRd
2011/10/10 <[email protected]>: > Hi.. > > thx for the Info. > > Here is a cibdump with both nodes running > http://pastebin.com/dx9EXK5Q > > HA-1 off > http://pastebin.com/345ks2RJ > > HA-2 off > http://pastebin.com/W5buGuMk > > Only the OBS moves from HA-2 to HA-1. Non of the other groups > > Im running CentOS 5.6 x64 > > rpm -qa |grep drbd > kmod-drbd83-8.3.8-1.el5.centos > drbd83-8.3.8-1.el5.centos > > Hans > > 2011/10/9 Florian Haas <[email protected]>: >> On 2011-10-08 19:00, [email protected] wrote: >>> sry forgot that it is an english list.. >> >> It's also a list that doesn't munge the reply-to header. :) I'll assume >> you meant to continue the discussion publicly and thus I'm replying to >> the list; next time just remember to hit "Reply to All" or "Reply to >> List". Else, please clearly mark any personal message to me as "off-list". >> >>> here is my cibadmin >>> http://pastebin.com/021Ea2FP >> >> A couple of comments on that one: >> >> That CIB dump reflects a status where both nodes are online, the >> resource groups DB and ISCSI aren't running, and their corresponding >> DRBD master/slave sets have both instances in the Slave role. That >> status is neither expected from the configuration, nor from the >> promotion scores that Pacemaker has calculated. Given the CIB status, >> one would expect both groups to be running on HA-1, yet they are >> reported as being in the Stopped state. Can you guarantee that you did >> not produce this CIB dump in the middle of a cluster transition? In >> other words, are you sure you waited for the cluster to complete all the >> actions it was going to run, before you produced this dump? >> >> I ask because ptest run with your CIB dump as its input does say that >> Pacemaker is about to promote drbd-crs, drbd-crs-fail, and drbd-db on >> HA-1 next. >> >> In addition, the following location constraints are all redundant: >> >> location SecondaryNode-DB DB 0: HA-2.inta-peters.com >> location SecondaryNode-ISCSI ISCSI 0: HA-2.inta-peters.com >> location SecondaryNode-OBS OBS 0: HA-1.inta-peters.com >> location SecondaryNode-SMB SMB 0: HA-1.inta-peters.com >> >> 0 is the placement score that Pacemaker assigns to every node, for every >> resource, in a symmetric cluster by default. So you can just remove >> those lines from the configuration. >> >> Of the following constraints, the third is redundant: >> >> colocation ISCSI_on_crs inf: ISCSI master-drbd-crs:Master >> colocation ISCSI_on_crs_fail inf: ISCSI master-drbd-crs-fail:Master >> colocation crs-fail_on_crs inf: master-drbd-crs-fail:Master >> master-drbd-crs:Master >> >> There are a few other minor glitches in the configuration, however none >> of those (as far as I can see) should prevent the cluster from failing >> over properly. >> >> If you're certain that you were _not_ just being impatient, and >> Pacemaker does in fact _not_ promote those master/slave sets despite >> saying it's going to, then some additional information about your setup >> would be helpful. Specifically your distro (CentOS 5.7?) and your DRBD >> version. >> >> Cheers, >> Florian >> >> -- >> Need help with High Availability? >> http://www.hastexo.com/now >> > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
