Hello Andreas, I did not want to post the following to the list. Thank you so much for your help thus far, it has enabled us to get up and running, and focus on other aspects of the project. I am slowly starting to learn the pcmk concept "the hard way! ;)" As for:
>>Cluster file system for Asterisk? Are you sure it's worth adding that >>extra layer? The idea is to cluster asterisk providing both failover and load balancing. We will attempt to do this using an ocf resource agent implemented by hastexo, or using a proxy. For this reason we are liking the idea of using a network filesystem for the asterisk config files. It's just prototyped right now using virutal machines. Yes of course, we can have an active/active asterisk cluster with each instance managing its own config files and therefore, eliminating ocfs/gfs etc.. Right now I have to figure out how "ocf:pacemaker:controld" works. And get myself away from the "not installed" error.... We have a working distributed locking mechanism however, I cannot find any good information on what the resource agent requires, how it works etc... As you know, the good thing about learning the hard way, and making ALL the mistakes is that, I will be able to idenify, and point out the mistakes others make when seeking help from the mailing list. Kind Regards, Nick from Toronto. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
