On 10/28/2011 11:06 AM, Alessandra Giovanardi wrote: > On 10/28/2011 10:35 AM, Andreas Kurz wrote: >> On 10/28/2011 09:21 AM, Alessandra Giovanardi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I solved the problem by using the hb_gui on the other node of the cluster. >>> >>> In that case the IPaddr resource shows the correct ocf/heartbeat >>> CLASS/PROVIDER (on the other node only heartbeat was reported) and the >>> new RG with the new IP are starting correctly. >>> >>> In effect seems a bug in the hb_gui...someone had the same problem on >>> DEBIAN 2.1.3? >> this software is nearly four years old! ... do I have to say more? ;-) >> > right, but this cluster should be active only for the next three/four > months and then we migrate all services on a farm (load balanced > environment). > Furthermore the services are very critical (no more than 5 minutes in > offline mode)...so we would minimize all change...
yes ... never touch a running system ;-) > >>> In your opinion can be a problem affecting the cluster functionality or >>> only the management? >> I prefered manipulating an offline version of the cib when HB 2.1.3 was >> "in", validation checked and replaced current config if all was ok. >> > How could you validate the new cib (and also the current one?)? > We need another cluster to test it? No need for another cluster to use the tools ... of course it is a good idea to have a test system before deploying a new config to critical systems. Try: cibadmin, crm_verify ... also xmllint might be helpful > >> My opinion is: consider an update ... or hire someone that can assist you. >> > Correct but as reported above this cluster should switch off in few months. Good luck! Regards, Andreas -- Need help with Pacemaker? http://www.hastexo.com/now > > > Thank you. > A. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
