Hi! I have a question : If I have a resource group with pacemaker (pacemaker-1.1.5-5.9.11.1 on SLES11 SP1) that has several resources, and I set one resource to "unmanaged", the group should not be affected, right? I also have a colocation like colocation col_ip2 inf: prm_ip2 cln_foo:Slave
When I set "prm_ip2" to unmanaged the clone (ms) resource cln_foo did a promote (slave to master on node where prm_ip2 is, and a demote master to slave on another node) action. The idea of the colocation was to have the IP address on the node where the slave instance of cln_foo is running. I hope the setup was fine. Misconfiguration or software bug? Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
