15.11.2011 10:55, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi Vladislav, > > filtering the devices for LVM also was on my mind, but changing the > filter cluster-wide after any configuration change seems too > error-prone for me. On the other side I couldn't a generic rule that > will match our configuration.
Attached code fragment works for me (I use it in my iscsi-multipath RA). > > On your attempts managing priority using "nice": Do you know about > "ionice"? I guess that's closer to what you are looking for. I didn't try it. Anyways you have scalability problem if you do not use filtering. Disks are slow... Best, Vladislav
lvm.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
