Sorry; they were included in the previous email but it appears it was
not properly spaced to be noticeable in the wall of text.

Syslog from sdgxen-3:
Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 attrd: [455]: notice: attrd_ais_dispatch:
Update relayed from sdgxen-2
Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 attrd: [455]: notice: attrd_trigger_update:
Sending flush op to all hosts for: terminate (true)
Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 attrd: [455]: notice: attrd_perform_update:
Sent update 7: terminate=true
Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 stonith-ng: [452]: info: crm_new_peer: Node
sdgxen-2 now has id: 2065306796
Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 stonith-ng: [452]: info: crm_new_peer: Node
2065306796 is now known as sdgxen-2
Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 stonith-ng: [452]: info: stonith_command:
Processed st_query from sdgxen-2: rc=0
Nov 28 15:01:21 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
Nov 28 15:01:22 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
Nov 28 15:01:23 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
Nov 28 15:01:24 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
Nov 28 15:01:25 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
Nov 28 15:01:14 sdgxen-3 stonith-ng: [452]: info: stonith_command:
Processed st_query from sdgxen-2: rc=0

Thanks,
-Hal

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Andreas Kurz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 08:07 PM, Hal Martin wrote:
>> Thank you for the updated link.
>>
>> I have recompiled pacemaker from checkout b9889764 and stonith still
>> fails to shoot nodes.
>
> Maybe posting also the logs from sdgxen-3 can help.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> --
> Need help with Pacemaker?
> http://www.hastexo.com/now
>
>>
>> sdgxen-2:/ # crm node fence sdgxen-3
>> Do you really want to shoot sdgxen-3? y
>>
>> Syslog from sdgxen-2:
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: WARN: pe_fence_node: Node
>> sdgxen-3 will be fenced because termination was requested
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: WARN:
>> determine_online_status: Node sdgxen-3 is unclean
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: WARN: stage6: Scheduling Node
>> sdgxen-3 for STONITH
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: notice: LogActions: Leave
>> stonith-sbd(Started sdgxen-2)
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: do_state_transition: State
>> transition S_POLICY_ENGINE -> S_TRANSITION_ENGINE [ input=I_PE_SUCCESS
>> cause=C_IPC_MESSAGE origin=handle_response ]
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: unpack_graph: Unpacked
>> transition 4: 4 actions in 4 synapses
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: do_te_invoke: Processing
>> graph 4 (ref=pe_calc-dc-1322492480-29) derived from
>> /var/lib/pengine/pe-warn-1278.bz2
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: te_pseudo_action: Pseudo
>> action 5 fired and confirmed
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: te_fence_node: Executing
>> reboot fencing operation (8) on sdgxen-3 (timeout=60000)
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 stonith-ng: [452]: info:
>> initiate_remote_stonith_op: Initiating remote operation reboot for
>> sdgxen-3: 76727be7-eecb-4778-857c-1a9288c63ee6
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 stonith-ng: [452]: info:
>> can_fence_host_with_device: stonith-sbd can not fence sdgxen-3:
>> dynamic-list
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 stonith-ng: [452]: info: stonith_command:
>> Processed st_query from sdgxen-2: rc=0
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: WARN: process_pe_message:
>> Transition 4: WARNINGs found during PE processing. PEngine Input
>> stored in: /var/lib/pengine/pe-warn-1278.bz2
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: notice: process_pe_message:
>> Configuration WARNINGs found during PE processing.  Please run
>> "crm_verify -L" to identify issues.
>> Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 stonith-ng: [452]: ERROR:
>> remote_op_query_timeout: Query 76727be7-eecb-4778-857c-1a9288c63ee6
>> for sdgxen-3 timed outNov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 stonith-ng: [452]:
>> ERROR: remote_op_timeout: Action reboot
>> (76727be7-eecb-4778-857c-1a9288c63ee6) for sdgxen-3 timed outNov 28
>> 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 stonith-ng: [452]: info: remote_op_done: Notifing
>> clients of 76727be7-eecb-4778-857c-1a9288c63ee6 (reboot of sdgxen-3
>> from ee8c34db-0e5d-4227-aa46-0ad8b3f306d1 by (null)): 0, rc=-8Nov 28
>> 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 stonith-ng: [452]: info: stonith_notify_client:
>> Sending st_fence-notification to client
>> 457/67849bf4-1881-48b9-a5e8-ab1f72116a81Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd:
>> [457]: info: tengine_stonith_callback: StonithOp <remote-op state="0"
>> st_target="sdgxen-3" st_op="reboot" />Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd:
>> [457]: info: tengine_stonith_callback: Stonith operation
>> 2/8:4:0:bd203590-3295-4f31-a720-01760a5394e8: Operation timed out
>> (-8)Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: ERROR:
>> tengine_stonith_callback: Stonith of sdgxen-3 failed (-8)... aborting
>> transition.Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info:
>> abort_transition_graph: tengine_stonith_callback:454 - Triggered
>> transition abort (complete=0) : Stonith failedNov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2
>> crmd: [457]: info: update_abort_priority: Abort priority upgraded from
>> 0 to 1000000Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info:
>> update_abort_priority: Abort action done superceeded by restartNov 28
>> 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: ERROR: tengine_stonith_notify: Peer
>> sdgxen-3 could not be terminated (reboot) by <anyone> for sdgxen-2
>> (ref=76727be7-eecb-4778-857c-1a9288c63ee6): Operation timed outNov 28
>> 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: run_graph:
>> ====================================================Nov 28 15:01:26
>> sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: notice: run_graph: Transition 4 (Complete=2,
>> Pending=0, Fired=0, Skipped=2, Incomplete=0,
>> Source=/var/lib/pengine/pe-warn-1278.bz2): StoppedNov 28 15:01:26
>> sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: te_graph_trigger: Transition 4 is now
>> completeNov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info:
>> do_state_transition: State transition S_TRANSITION_ENGINE ->
>> S_POLICY_ENGINE [ input=I_PE_CALC cause=C_FSA_INTERNAL
>> origin=notify_crmd ]Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info:
>> do_state_transition: All 2 cluster nodes are eligible to run
>> resources.Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: do_pe_invoke:
>> Query 81: Requesting the current CIB: S_POLICY_ENGINENov 28 15:01:26
>> sdgxen-2 crmd: [457]: info: do_pe_invoke_callback: Invoking the PE:
>> query=81, ref=pe_calc-dc-1322492486-30, seq=240, quorate=1Nov 28
>> 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: WARN: pe_fence_node: Node sdgxen-3
>> will be fenced because termination was requestedNov 28 15:01:26
>> sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: WARN: determine_online_status: Node sdgxen-3
>> is uncleanNov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 pengine: [456]: WARN: stage6:
>> Scheduling Node sdgxen-3 for STONITHNov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-2 pengine:
>> [456]: notice: LogActions: Leave   stonith-sbd(Started sdgxen-2)
>> Syslog from sdgxen-3:
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 attrd: [455]: notice: attrd_ais_dispatch:
>> Update relayed from sdgxen-2
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 attrd: [455]: notice: attrd_trigger_update:
>> Sending flush op to all hosts for: terminate (true)
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 attrd: [455]: notice: attrd_perform_update:
>> Sent update 7: terminate=true
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 stonith-ng: [452]: info: crm_new_peer: Node
>> sdgxen-2 now has id: 2065306796
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 stonith-ng: [452]: info: crm_new_peer: Node
>> 2065306796 is now known as sdgxen-2
>> Nov 28 15:01:20 sdgxen-3 stonith-ng: [452]: info: stonith_command:
>> Processed st_query from sdgxen-2: rc=0
>> Nov 28 15:01:21 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
>> Nov 28 15:01:22 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
>> Nov 28 15:01:23 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
>> Nov 28 15:01:24 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
>> Nov 28 15:01:25 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
>> Nov 28 15:01:26 sdgxen-3 sbd: [442]: info: Latency: 1
>> Nov 28 15:01:14 sdgxen-3 stonith-ng: [452]: info: stonith_command:
>> Processed st_query from sdgxen-2: rc=0
>>
>> sdgxen-2:/ # crm_verify -L -V
>> crm_verify[572]: 2011/11/28_15:06:01 WARN: pe_fence_node: Node
>> sdgxen-3 will be fenced because termination was requested
>> crm_verify[572]: 2011/11/28_15:06:01 WARN: determine_online_status:
>> Node sdgxen-3 is unclean
>> crm_verify[572]: 2011/11/28_15:06:01 WARN: stage6: Scheduling Node
>> sdgxen-3 for STONITH
>> Warnings found during check: config may not be valid
>>
>> sdgxen-2:/ # crm configure show
>> node sdgxen-2
>> node sdgxen-3
>> primitive stonith-sbd stonith:external/sbd \
>>         meta is-managed="true" target-role="Started"
>> property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
>>         dc-version="1.1.6-git" \
>>         cluster-infrastructure="openais" \
>>         stonith-enabled="true" \
>>         stonith-timeout="60s" \
>>         stonith-action="reboot" \
>>         expected-quorum-votes="2"
>>
>> I appreciate any feedback on this issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hal
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Florian Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Hal Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Looking at the mercurial repository for pacemaker
>>>> (http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/) I do not see any check-ins
>>>> since 1.1.6 was tagged two months ago.
>>>
>>> Pacemaker has since moved to GitHub:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Florian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Need help with Pacemaker?
>>> http://www.hastexo.com/knowledge/pacemaker
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-HA mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
> --
> Need help with Pacemaker?
> http://www.hastexo.com/now
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to