Hi Yan,

> Created 2.0 branch and tagged "pacemaker-mgmt-2.0.1" which is compatible
> with pacemaker-1.0.x.
> 
> https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/tree/2.0

Thanks!!

> Please verify it before I pushed it to ClusterLabs.

I just confirmed that I was not different in two next contents.
 * gao-yan-pacemaker-mgmt-c296fa8
 * gao-yan-pacemaker-mgmt-7000815

Cheers,
Hideo Yamauchi.

--- On Mon, 2011/12/5, Gao,Yan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Hideo,
> 
> On 12/02/11 14:38, [email protected] wrote:
> > Hi Yan,
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > I confirmed movement in combination with Pacemaker1.0.12 in a repository of 
> > your test.
> >  * https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/commits/2.0-test
> > 
> > 
> > On my test, both SNMP and GUI worked without a problem.
> > 
> > Please release the contents of this repository as GUI for Pacemaker1.0 
> > system.
> Created 2.0 branch and tagged "pacemaker-mgmt-2.0.1" which is compatible
> with pacemaker-1.0.x.
> 
> https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/tree/2.0
> 
> Please verify it before I pushed it to ClusterLabs.
> 
> Regards,
>   Gaoyan
> -- 
> Gao,Yan <[email protected]>
> Software Engineer
> China Server Team, SUSE.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> 
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to