Hi Thanks. OK but I also could mount the FS , the problems in 2010 on RHEL was that the configuration was not robust , meaning that during validation tests, there were often cases where both nodes were dead : one fenced by Pacemaker and the other killed itself by ocfs2, or problems on mount read-only FS after failover , etc. Alain
De : "Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> A : <[email protected]> Date : 02/02/2012 15:33 Objet : [Linux-HA] Antw: Status about ocfs2.pcmk ? Envoyé par : [email protected] Hi! I have something running using OCFS on SLES11 SP1: ocf:pacemaker:controld ocf:ocfs2:o2cb At least I could mount the filesystem with it: /dev/drbd_r0 on /exports/ocfs/samba type ocfs2 (rw,_netdev,acl,cluster_stack=pcmk) Regards, Ulrich >>> <[email protected]> schrieb am 02.02.2012 um 14:54 in Nachricht <offed8db74.9970c9e4-onc1257998.004a64db-c1257998.004b1...@bull.net>: > Hi > > Just wonder if someone has succeded to configured a working HA > configuration with Pacemaker/corosync > and OCFS2 file systems, meaning using ocfs2.pcmk , on RHEL6 mainly (and > eventually SLES11) ? > > (I tried at the end of 2010 but gave up after a few weeks because it was > not working at all) > > Thanks if someone can give a status? > Regards > Alain Moullé > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
