On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:29 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andreas , > thanks for your response, but two questions : > 1/ why going with GFS2 ? because you know that ocfs2+pacemaker still does > not > work fine on rhel ? or ... ?
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for OCFS2 to be supported on RHEL. The only people putting any effort into getting it to work, if any, would be the OCFS2 team itself. > 2/ you're right GFS2 is working much better with pacemaker than OCFS2, but > the problem > is that GFS2 was about 10 times less efficient with regard to IO > benchs than OCFS2 ! > Is this status has changed since 2010 ? I dont' think so when watching > all the messages > on Mailing List ... but I'm not sure ... > Thanks > Alain > > > > De : Andreas Kurz <[email protected]> > A : [email protected] > Date : 02/02/2012 15:47 > Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Status about ocfs2.pcmk ? > Envoyé par : [email protected] > > > > On 02/02/2012 02:54 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi >> >> Just wonder if someone has succeded to configured a working HA >> configuration with Pacemaker/corosync >> and OCFS2 file systems, meaning using ocfs2.pcmk , on RHEL6 mainly (and >> eventually SLES11) ? > > For RHEL6 I'd recommend you go with GFS2 and follow the Cluster from > Scratch documentation ... I know OCFS2 on SLES11 SP1 is working fine in > a Pacemaker cluster. > > Regards, > Andreas > > -- > Need help with Pacemaker? > http://www.hastexo.com/now > >> >> (I tried at the end of 2010 but gave up after a few weeks because it was > >> not working at all) >> >> Thanks if someone can give a status? >> Regards >> Alain Moullé >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > [pièce jointe "signature.asc" supprimée par Alain Moulle/FR/BULL] > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
