Hi! but like with CPU affinity there should be no needless change of the DC. I also wondered why after each configuration change the DC is newly elected (it seems).
Regards, Ulrich >>> Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> schrieb am 05.02.2012 um 23:48 in >>> Nachricht <caedlwg1yc2sug+q4mqko_gjdypnd-o0bkhzhmbpyh3ovjma...@mail.gmail.com>: > The location of the DC is an internal detail which you shouldn't care about. > Why do you want to be able to predetermine its location? > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mayank <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I'm using pacemaker to manage our some of resources including Virtual IP. > > It is working well in case of failover. Now we've to execute some our > > policies before selecting DC during split-brain resolution. Still I'm unable > > to figure out on what basis pacemaker selects DC after split-brain > > resolution. If I've 2 node setup, some time it selects node-1 other times it > > selects node-2. We've out RA which is forced to run on the node which is DC. > > Just because of this un-predicable behavior of DC selection, we want to > > execute some of our policies before selecting DC. Is there any way to do > so? > > > > > > > > Mayank Mittal > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
