On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Does your scope supersede that of CfS? >> >> I would definitely think so. CfS doesn't much touch upon performance, >> and I don't see any need to -- it's a good document to get you >> started, and shouldn't be overloaded with too much nitty-gritty >> performance optimization stuff. > > That sort of answers my question. Basically I meant "should we keep > it", to which I think you're saying "yes".
What, your question was about whether to keep CfS? Oh yes, definitely so. Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
